I don’t want to sound all Holier Than Thou in this post, but I’m going to anyway. I write this blog, by myself, for no money, I am a blogger. There are many other commercial blogs out there that contain writers who like to say “we’re journalists” but “we’re bloggers” if someone questions their professional standards.
One thing that always provokes the latter is when someone questions the tone of a piece or the non-impartiality of the writer.
One thing that keeps cropping up that bugs me is the use of the word “crappy”, in fact the title of this piece is actually “‘Crappy’ Writers” – you see, I’m not being personal. At all. Honestly.
You see it regularly when describing gear that the writer feels is not to their liking, or is a bit old, and seems to be said in a kind of nod to the knowing audience who would of course all be agreeing. Recent examples include a preview of an un-released tablet from a company that wasn’t Apple being described as “another crappy tablet” even though the spec hadn’t been announced and nobody had seen it and a photo taken from one aircraft of another which was taken not with a high-end DSLR worth thousands but with a “crappy Canon ELPH”. Was it an appallingly bad photo? No, especially as it was taken from a moving aircraft and was a photo of two other moving aircraft. As we all know “at the end of the day the best camera is the one you have with you.” In reality at the end of the day the best camera is the one with a tripod, or a flash, the rest of the day anything will do. Sorry.
The crappy word isn’t always said, I’ve seen articles about a new phone or chipset saying “but if you’re reading this website you won’t want it because it’s a budget phone” oh so being interested in tech is limited to the well-off now is it?
If there’s a justification, then say it’s not a brilliant piece of kit, review it properly but to say that someone’s camera is crappy just because it’s not this year’s wi-fi connected, app enabled wondersnapper is unfair. As is describing something that’s aimed at the less well off as crappy just because it’s not got a Ultra HD Full-Eyeball Neural Screen.
Not everyone can afford (or be given) the latest, top of the range kit, so how about holding back the longer c-word for the genuinely crap.